Saturday, May 29, 2010
Year Two
Now back to sports. Last time around I predicted a swift beating of the Celtics. I also predicted a quartering of the Lakers. Unfortunately for me, the numbers were against me and the Magic played like they had no desire to be there. The Suns are on the ropes right now, but luckily they're in Phoenix where they haven't lost in this series. I said that the Celtics and Lakers would probably be in simply because of my distaste for both squads.
After watching the Ron Artest play, my mind has changed. I wouldn't mind the champions getting another ring. Despite the fact that I wish Ron Artest was in Houston, I'm glad that he has a chance to get a ring. After all the things he's had to go through in the league, and admittedly most of those troubles were his fault, it's nice to see the now wiser Artest help his team get to the top of the mountain. Pretty much as long as Boston doesn't get there.
You picked against the Celtics again?
I know, I know. The Celtics are better than I thought and better than I want them to be. It annoys me to no end. I want LA/PHX to win. I can get behind either of those teams. As long as its not Boston. Anything but Boston.
Friday, May 14, 2010
Well that was stupid
Self deprecation seems to be a recent theme. The NBA playoffs has been pretty awful for me. But here I go again
You’re not going to pick against Boston and LA again are you?
Let’s not talk about it
Didn’t they just burn you twice?
There’s still a chance
The Jazz didn’t even win a game, why are you going to jinx the Suns
I’m sorry
You picked the Cavs on purpose didn’t you, to get Lebron to win in NY right
No, but it would be nice.
Look, either way this is going to continue to be rough
Suns over LAKERS (in six)
Now that I’ve doomed Steve Nash, I may as well explain why. The Suns remind me of a better version of the Heat team that won in ‘06. Cagey vets that just want to win one (See Hill, Grant and Nash, Steve). On top of that I hate the Lakers. My problem is that I can’t imagine Nash not spanking Fisher. (See Williams, Deron and Westbrook, Russell). Kobe isn’t what he used to be and they’re this close to collapse
Isn’t this the same argument you used to say the would Thunder would win.
Yes… and if Ibaka had boxed out Gasol it would have happened.
MAGIC over Celtics in five
I’m a bit more sure of this, the Celts played some uninspired ball in the Cavs series. The Magic have been amazing recently 27 of their last 30 were wins
You’re doomed to a Celts-Lakers final, you know that right
Yes.
Don’t know when I upset the playoff gods but… here we go, again.
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Mea Culpa
1. @ChrisBosh.
Stop playing games. Injury aside, Toronto doesn't want you anymore. They've given up on you and think that you'll stay for peanuts because they (over)paid for Turkoglu. So why would you ask on Twitter should you stay or should you go, when it's clear that they want you out.
And by that, I mean, make sure you go to the Knicks.
CC: Dwayne Wade, Amare, Lebron
2. @NBASchedule
Game 1 of the Eastern Conference semis is today, Game 7 of a divisional round is tommorow. Maybe I'm the only person who sees something wrong with that.
Fine, but the winner of this game should have to face the Magic immediately following the game.
3. @MyPredictions
I know, I know. I shouldn't even talk about the playoffs after what I said to start them.
a. Miami will beat the Celtics (stupid in hindsight)
b. Mavs are a sneaky team that will contend in the west (History should have warned me and I didn't listen)
c. The Thunder will beat the Lakers
(I don't regret this one as much, but it was clear that no one other than Westbrook and Durant wanted to play the Lakers, and everyone on the Lakers wanted to guard Durant, at the same time).
d. Without Bogut the Hawks will roll the Bucks. (Come on ATL. Win it in Game Seven, please)
e. How are the Jazz going to beat the Nugs without healthy players (in six)
But to be fair, I did get the Westbrook thing right. (Second coming of AI against Derek Fisher) And my finals matchup (Phoenix-Cleveland) is still intact.
But past that, I really have no business picking basketball games. I don't watch enough to make reasonable predictions.
4. In Case your still reading
(Phoenix, Cavs, Magic, Jazz advance) just saying.
Yes, I realize I just picked against the reigning NBA champs for the second time in a row.
Yes I realize I'm picking against Boston for the second time in a row
Yes I'm picking Phoenix to beat the Spurs for the millionth time in a row, and those picks have rarely been successful
As previously stated. I don't make reasonable predictions
Monday, April 26, 2010
Violent video games and the Supreme Court
Shocking news (to me) from DC. Certiorari was granted in the case regarding a California law banning the sale of violent video games to minors. This is by far the biggest thing to happen to video game law. Period. This is the first time any video game law has gone to the US Supreme Court. Considering that this marks the combination of two of my favorite topics (video games and the law). This may be the most interesting thing to happened in the year so far. Certainly more important things have happened (Haiti, Chile, Iceland, Poland) but nothing that affects me more. Will the Supreme Court declare this law (and by extension, other laws like it) unconstitutional?
This would be a big boost to the video game industry. The ESRB is the video game industry's self regulation process and in my opinion a very good one. Unfortunately, unlike the MPAA ratings (G, PG, PG-13, R, etc.) the ESRB's ratings have been misunderstood. Hence, games like Bully (a T-rated game) get lumped in with more violent fare like Grand Theft Auto (an M-rated game). To make this more clear, imagine if people thought that E.T. and Saving Private Ryan were equally violent because they were directed by the same person (Steven Spielberg).
More News upcoming when I finish reading the writ of certiorari (filed by the State of California) and in the fall when this case is presented and decided.
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Post-Draft
1. Ravens
The knocks on the Ravens last year. No Wide recievers, and an aging defense. Well, now they have Boldin and Stallworth. I believe Boldin will improve the team immensely. Plus, they got "Mount" Cody. He's big, athletic and someone who I saw and liked in the games I watched.
2. The Jets
while I believe that their running game was completely gutted thanks to the absence of Jones (KC) and Washinton (Seattle) , the addition of a future hall of famer in LT may be enough to make their running game acceptable.
But back to the important stuff. They obtained wide recievers, they stole Cromartie, But They aren't number one because in all honesty they rearranged the team moreso than they made it better. They adjusted it from a gritty run first team to an athletic pass happy team. Now to hope that Sanchez can convert to a decent QB
3. The Panthers
(See Jets, 2009) Lame QB? Mediocre Back-up? Get a new one. They were already a pretty good team, Clausen can't be worse than Delhomme. And he's probably better than Moore. Now he leaves Notre Dame for a baptism by fire in Oakland.
4. The Rai...
I can't. The (team from California that wears Silver and Black) always make me regret singing their praises.But don;t be surprised if I get suckered into mentioning that the Raiders will be better than average this year, the Wrs have more experience, the RBs have more experience. The QB is not named JaMarcus Russell. And they managed not to lose Nnamdi. And if all else fails they have the two best special teams kickers in the league
5. The Redskins
Upgrade from Campbell to McNabb means everything. The additions of Willie Parker and Larry Johnson don't make them a worse team.
And Orakpo is still there .
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Thank You, Andy Reid.
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Sports Games
2k10 has owned my xbox over the last few months. Mostly because I haven't bought any new games recently, but moreso because I'm addicted to the My player mode. I like my RPG's to be subtle. This is why I can't get into a game like Blue Dragon, but I love games with RPG elements like Borderlands and NBA 2k10. I'd strongly consider getting any game that does stats as well as 2k10. There's something satisfying in real life about seeing a team like the Lakers finally come together and prove they were worth the hype. Meanwhile NBA 2k10 was more like last years Houston Rockets team. On the surface it seems like its a world beater of a game, but it's fragile where it matters.
2k10, almost 6 months after the game was released should be completely patched up and ready to go. (i.e. like playoff bound playoff teams) The game has a great set of features. The game feels like basketball. It's not too arcade like in its features. Generally the game gets the characters right. Some things feel awkward ( Yao Ming is a bit too dominant in the paint, and Garnett's video game presence is better than his real life version) but overall the players play as you'd expect.
The My player feature is great as you progress from training camp, to the draft, to the D-league, to benchwarming, then to starting in the NBA. On that end it works fine. The other (much-advertised) purpose of the my player option is.