Pages

Friday, February 28, 2014

Acceptable “Niggas”


Note: I'm not adding censorship stars. I'm not giving polite dashes. You and I both know which word we're talking about here.

"Cause I'm the nigga, the nigga nigga, like how you figure?
Getting figures and fuckin' bitches, she rolling Swishers
Brought her bitches, I brought my niggas, they getting bent up off the liquor
She love my licorice, I let her lick it
They say money make a nigga act nigger-ish
But least a nigga nigga-rich" A$AP Rocky- Fucking Problems

"Gold all in my chain, gold all in my ring
Gold all in my watch
Don't believe me, just watch
Nigga nigga nigga
Don't believe me, just watch
Don't believe me, just watch
Nigga nigga nigga" - Trinidad James (All Gold Everything)

"You little niggas ain't deep you dumb
You niggas ain't gangsta, you gum, I chew lil' niggas
Hock-too, spew lil' niggas
I can only view lil' niggas like lil' niggas
But in lieu of lil' niggas trying to play that boy
I *pew, pew* lil' niggas with the latest toy
Unlike you lil' nigga, I'm a grown ass man
Big shoes to fill nigga, grown ass pants" - Jay-Z (Trouble)

Last year, during the second semester of my 2L year (second-year of law school for the uninitiated) I wrote a lengthy seminar paper about the N-word. I called the paper "Acceptable Niggas". It involved a ton of research (easily the most time I've put into a law school assignment in any capacity) I went to Westlaw and looked up every case where the word nigger was used. I didn't find anything interesting and almost decided not to continue my paper. But then I decided to look up other variations of the word. I looked up “nigga”, and “nigg-ah” and found some incredibly interesting cases. Without boring you with the individual cases and results, I found something to be generally true. The courts don't know what the hell to do with the word. Mostly, because no one else really does.

The question I found myself asking repeatedly while doing the research was "Who can use the N-word and why" Hence, me calling my paper "Acceptable Niggas". Maybe I should have asked is it ever acceptable to use the N-word? (Note I'm using the "N-word" phrasing because I don't want to have to decide whether to spell it with an -er or an -a).

Here's what we know to be true about the N-word. At one point is was completely acceptable to by society to use the word nigger. There was really only one context for its use. It was a word used to subjugate, lessen and demean black people. It was a simpler time. When you heard a group of people using it to describe you, you knew that it wasn't meant in any other way. If you were black, there was a really good chance the use of the word was a signal that your safety was at risk.

Since then things have changed. People have been using it to describe people in a neutral way. People often use it in a sense that is no more intentionally inflammatory than the word "dude". However, people still use it in its original sense. As a 24-year old black guy, I'm not nearly old enough to remember it used before and during lynching. I'm not even old enough to remember the rapper Ice Cube introducing himself to the world as a "crazy motherfucker named Ice Cube / From the gang called Niggas Wit Attitudes" on Straight Outta Compton. (Straight outta Compton was released a year before I was born) But since being an adult, I've also been described using the word. I've heard it in the negative "I won't allow a nigger to date my daughter" sense and I've been congratulated on a law school accomplishment with a Denzel Washington style "My Nigga".

I listen to music that features the word prominently. I quote those lyrics uncensored when I talk to my New York friends. I censor those lyrics when I quote them anywhere near my law school friends in Colorado. I hear friends of all shades who use "nigga" casually. I have friends of all shades who censor it. And I have white friends who don't even look remotely comfortable saying the phrase "the N-word", much less actually using it, in any context. I'm occasionally appalled to hear it, I'm occasionally confused when I don't hear it. When I first moved to Boulder, I heard it so rarely that it's jarring. When I went back to visit New York, I heard it so often that it was jarring. I stopped using it in Colorado, period, after 2 of my classmates got on me for using it. I didn't really have a good reason to argue with them, other than the fact I was quoting the song "Niggas in Paris" which features the word prominently. I stopped getting on people for using it, because if they aren't using it in a racist way, and the N-Word is supposed to be a proxy for racism, then I don't have a particularly good reason to. (I could talk about the words brutal history, but it makes me sound like Justice Scalia with his originalist rants, and that makes me more uncomfortable than any use of the N-word).

It would be easy to separate by race if the world worked that way. Sure, if you do it that way, Jay Z (who’s black) can use the word. Eminem (who’s white) can't. Simple enough. Is Barack Obama (who's biracial) use the word? Is Blake Griffin (equally bi-racial, but lighter skinned) allowed to use it? What about Asian people, whose history in America has little to do with the history of the n-word directed at black people. What about Hispanic people? (You flow cold but Joe flow sicker/Even Reverend Al be like, "Joe's that nigga!"/John Gotti, Supreme Team show/These are the niggas you compare to Joe, HELLO! - Fat Joe (The Crackhouse)). That doesn't work, at all. Especially because there are a lot of people who aren’t racist and use the word as “in-crowd” slang and with absolutely no malice intended.

The courts (in many cases) tried to separate the N-word between Nigger (the older word with the awful history) and Nigga (the word which, may be profane, but that black people use, and is totally not racist). Even if you get past the bizarre differentiation (If I say the way that black people say it, then it's okay), this separation is problematic. There's a lot of times where I here black people say it with a distinct "-er" and no intention of being racist. There are a lot of people who don't pronounce the -er in any word ("lawyas", "doctas", and "plumbas") and say nigga with all the intentional malice that the word “nigger” would connote. It also doesn't get to the distinctions in context that are created by how the word is used. It also doesn't address that for some people there is absolutely no context where calling them a "nigga" or "nigger" would ever be acceptable. And given the word’s history, it feels outright insulting to tell black people that they shouldn’t be offended by THAT word.

Maybe one day this will all be figured out. I know that I have very few privileges that result from me being black, but that one of them is that I can use the word without people presuming that I'm racist. I don't know what society will decide to do with the word. I don't know what the courts will decide to do with the word. I don't even know whether I will continue to use the word in any context. Maybe it will be like gay slurs, which I don't use at all. Maybe it will be like other profane terms like "fuck", which I use often, but would never use in court, church or within earshot of my mom (or any other places where the rationale "But, I'm an adult" holds no weight). But until then, we'll have to decide (individually and collectively) if and when the use of the nigga is acceptable.

Until then I have to decide whether a crowd of people saying nigga makes me cringe or whether it's preferable to a censored version. (One of my favorite songs from Kendrick Lamar’s album being performed… in Salt Lake City, Utah).

Kendrick Lamar performing M.a.a.d City in Salt Lake City, Utah.

"Man down, where you from, nigga?"
"Fuck who you know, where you from, my nigga?"
"Where your grandma stay, huh, my nigga?"
"This m.A.A.d city I run, my nigga" - Kendrick Lamar (M.a.a.d. City)

Monday, February 3, 2014

NBA: Where Rim Protection Happens

 

Sometimes, it has felt like I’ve been the only one watching the NBA. Great games are on and the media focuses on the NFL. When the media does discuss the NBA, it’s only for the low hanging fruit of the “Are the Heat suddenly terrible?” or other basic and obvious stories. Now that the NFL season is over, more people will be watching, or at least paying attention.
  

Nationally Televised Schedule: All times EST

Monday
San Antonio at New Orleans NBATV 8PM
Watching the Pelicans play the Spurs has been rewarding. Anthony Davis has shown that he's the heir to the "best power forward alive" throne. Davis has put up amazing statlines over the last few weeks. Last week gave us these (PTS/REBS/BLKS) lines: 24/8/6, 30/7/8, and a monstrous 22/19/7. He's the biggest All-Star snub. (20-10 and 3 doesn't get you in? I guess defense isn't appreciated here (looking at Kevin Love, Blake Griffin and Dirk Nowitzki)

He's playing against the former owner of the best power forward alive title, Tim Duncan, who is having a good season in his own right. (Averaging 15/10/2). Timmy is one of the most consistent players in the league. (His nicknames on basketball reference include “The Big Fundamental”, “Groundhog Day”, and “Death & Taxes”). He's not fun to watch in the typical sense, as he isn't likely to have any highlight plays but if you are an up and coming PF/C then you ought to watch Duncan.

No Nationally Televised Games on Tuesday

Wednesday

Portland at New York ESPN 8PM
The most recent New York controversy concerns whether or not Carmelo Anthony will stay in the Big Apple or escape in free agency. It's a major problem for the Knicks. People seem to be split as to whether or not Anthony will stick around, and for good reason. Anthony forced his way out of Denver to New York, and the idea is that since the New York Knicks haven't won and the organization remains dysfunctional that he will leave. So far he has said all the right things, but unlike Kyrie Irving (who is facing a similar controversy), Anthony has the power to put all of the discussion to rest. Anthony could commit to opting into the last year of his deal or sign an extension. This leads me to believe that he's not sticking around, or at the very least he's holding the Knicks hostage.

The problem is that the Knicks don't suffer from cheap ownership (See Bulls, Chicago). New York City is a solid place to live and play basketball (See Cavaliers, Cleveland). The only problem that they have is that their owner has historically made bad decisions. You can't hold the team hostage if the owner is inept.

Miami at LA Clippers ESPN 1030PM
The Los Angeles CP3's haven't lost a step since their leader has been injured. They've won 5 out of their last 6 games keeping them in strong contention in the West. Meanwhile the other side of the ball features a Miami team that’s not quite reeling, but could always use a good win…. somewhat. It's a truism that the regular season doesn't matter in basketball (16 teams out of 30 make the playoffs after all). Right now, there isn't really a good reason for the Heat to win a ton of games like they did last year. The Heat are currently 8 games ahead of their nearest division competitor. This locks them into the top 4 of the playoffs at absolute worst. However they are 8.5 games ahead of their nearest division leader (Toronto, currently) This means that barring a serious collapse, they will have the #2 seed in the East. Certainly, that presents the problem of a potential Game 7 in Indiana, but given that the Heat are one of the oldest (probably the oldest, but I don't have good stats in front of me) teams in the league, the rest is more important.

Thursday

San Antonio at Brooklyn TNT 8PM
Joe Johnson's all-star appearances have historically been a product of him playing in the Eastern Conference. This is one is no different. There might be 10 guards better than him in the west, but because he plays in the east, he gets in.

Chicago at Golden State TNT 1030PM
Remember when Chicago traded away their best healthy player and it seemed obvious that the Bulls were going to TANK (caps intended for sarcastic effect). Well, not so much. Since the trade, they've played against the Bucks, Bobcats (twice), Wizards, Magic, 76ers, Lakers, Timberwolves, Pelicans and Cavaliers. None of these teams are above .500 and they've only lost to the Pelicans and Wolves, amongst those teams. In the limited action they've had against above .500 teams (Washington twice, San Antonio and Los Angeles ), They've only beaten Los Angeles. That puts them at 3 games over .500 since they've unloaded Deng. Now this isn't a great winning percentage, but in the East, only 4 teams are 3 games over .500 or more for the season (as opposed to 9 in the West). The Bulls are still good enough to be a playoff team in the conference, and could very well make the second round. They aren't "dangerous", “sneaky good” or any of the other sports codewords for "better than their record indicates" but they are the 6th seed in a conference that doesn't have a lot of talent. For the entire season, they have the easiest strength of schedule so far.

Friday

Portland at Indiana ESPN 700PM
Should I talk about the Suns non-story or the Bynum non-story. So recently, the Pacers lost 2 games to the suns and media members have questioned if their record is smoke and mirrors. 1) The Suns are really good (really, which when used here means “actually”, and not “very”). 2) The Pacers will not see the Suns in the playoffs this year and if they do I’ll tattoo the box scores on my face. (Note: Not really).      

Minnesota at New Orleans ESPN 930PM
One day, the Timberwolves will be over the .500 mark. Looking at the team it’s hard to tell what the problem is. Right now, I’d put the blame on their center,  Nikola Pekovic who currently averages half a block per game. There are 8 guards that average that or more. Do you know how hard it is to do that? Damn near impossible. It’s not like they have an elite shot blocker standing near him. The PF for the Wolves is Kevin Love.  Then I thought well maybe he was a better defender then I thought, and his problem was merely that he was unlucky with blocks, but that makes him look even worse. Among comparable players (28 minutes or more and 6 FGA at the rim or more) he is the second worst player in the entire NBA, with only his teammate Kevin Love protecting at a worse percentage. (BTW if the 28/6 seems arbitrary, it basically encompasses starting centers and power forwards). The Timberwolves would do just as well if they had a vending machine in the paint, rather than Pek and Love.

Saturday

Denver at Detroit NBATV 730PM
So I just watched my 4th live game this year. Being in a market where the team isn’t that good has a great perk. Namely, ticket prices are relatively cheap. As the Nuggets continue to flirt with the playoffs, I get to see the good teams that they face. My live shows have included a convincing beating of the Bulls, a close loss to the Cavaliers and a loss to Toronto. Now that they’ve lost Nate Robinson (ACL) and Gallo for the season, the plucky, if inconsistent, Nuggets appear headed for a much needed lottery appearance.   

Sunday

New York at Oklahoma City ABC 1PM
This matchup features Carmelo Anthony, reigning scoring champion, and Kevin Durant 3 time champ and current leader. Watching the two work has been fun over the last few years.

Chicago at LA Lakers ABC 330PM
The Lakers, to the great dismay of their always optimistic fans, are headed towards the lottery. D’Antoni is once again in the hot seat, despite presenting a strong case for why he deserves a head coaching position.  The Lakers are doing a lot with castoff players. Xavier Henry, Wesley Johnson and Kendall Marshall have all been serviceable players at one point or another. The problem is that you can’t win a championship with players like this. In the East, they’d be in the playoffs. In the West, they are another team on the outside of the hunt.

Dallas at Boston NBATV 6PM
Let me be honest here. I have no meaningful opinion of either of these teams. Neither of these teams have affected me in any meaningful way. Dallas is good, but not a team that I’m concerned about for the playoffs. Boston is a team that’s headed toward to the top of the lottery. Dirk is having a good season. Rajon Rondo is healthy again. I’ll be watching this game just to see what’s going on with these teams.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

NBA: Where Midseason Lulls Happens

TL;DR – Just the nationally televised schedule for the week.

 

Tuesday
San Antonio at Houston NBATV 8PM
Chandler Parsons has been amazing. The Houston Rockets are an absolutely dangerous team considering the lack of defense that they play

Wednesday
Oklahoma at Miami ESPN 7PM
This finals rematch would be a lot different with Westbrook. Without him, it features scoring machine Kevin Durant and a head to head matchup between the presumptive MVP candidates. 

Chicago at San Antonio 930PM
The defensive minded Spurs have been successful despite losing their main defensive players to injuries.

Thursday
Cleveland at New York TNT 8PM
This is all an opportunity to talk about Kyrie Irving. Kyrie's teams have been awful. He's benefitted from a weak guard class in the East to get to the top of the All Star voting. Thanks to Rose and Rondo's injuries Kyrie is arguably the best PG in the East. Jeff Teague is also on the short list. 

LA Clippers at Golden State TNT 1030PM
The Clippers have been fine since losing Chris Paul. Part of the reason is Darren Collison. Years ago, when he played for New Orleans he was thrust into a starting role when CP3 was injured. Now, he's doing the same thing. Opportunities to be a starting point guard are limited (only 30 spots in the league)

Friday
Oklahoma City at Brooklyn ESPN 8PM
The Nets have been an extremely successful team this month. This is happening despite the loss of Brook Lopez.

Saturday
Miami at New York ESPN 830PM
The Heat-Knicks rivalry was the biggest rivalry of my youth. The Knicks were second for the majority of last year as opposed to the Heat who won the championship last year. Last, seeing the matchup between Carmelo Anthony (the 3rd overall pick in 2003) go against Lebron James (the 1st overall pick) is always interesting.

Sunday
No Nationally Televised games on Sunday (It's Super Bowl Sunday.)

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Where Free League Pass Happens

 

For the second time this year,  NBA League Pass is free. This allows you to watch all NBA games live regardless of location, as long as you are in the US. It also allows you to watch all of the previous games this season, so you have the opportunity to watch every Durant 40 point game or every 8 block game.

The trial ends on Sunday (January 26th) so you may as well take advantage of the weekend. Also, it's not as if there's any football or baseball to get in the way.

NBA League Pass allows you to watch on Cable TV, Laptop/Tablet, or Mobile. There are also XBOX and PS3 Apps for it.


Games played this weekend (All Times EST)

Thursday, January 23 - All Games are Nationally Televised, and by "all", I mean both.
LA Lakers at Miami    8:00 PM    TNT   
Denver at Portland    10:30 PM TNT   

Friday, January 24 - 13 Games, 2 Nationally Televised
LA Lakers at Orlando    7:00 PM   
Toronto at Philadelphia    7:00 PM   
Oklahoma City at Boston    7:30 PM           
New Orleans at Detroit    7:30 PM   
Charlotte at New York    7:30 PM
San Antonio at Atlanta    7:30 PM   
Dallas at Brooklyn    7:30 PM   
Milwaukee at Cleveland    7:30 PM   
Memphis at Houston    8:00 PM   
LA Clippers at Chicago    8:00 PM    ESPN   
Washington at Phoenix    9:00 PM   
Indiana at Sacramento    10:00 PM
Minnesota at Golden State    10:30 PM    NBATV

Saturday, January 25 - 8 games, 2 nationally televised
Oklahoma City at Philadelphia    7:30 PM   
Houston at Memphis    8:00 PM   
Chicago at Charlotte    7:00 PM    NBATV   
LA Clippers at Toronto    7:00 PM   
Atlanta at Milwaukee    8:30 PM   
Indiana at Denver    9:00 PM   
Washington at Utah    9:00 PM   
Minnesota at Portland    10:00 PM NBATV

Sunday, January 26 - 8 games, 3 nationally televised games
San Antonio at Miami    1:00 PM        ABC   
LA Lakers at New York    3:30 PM        ABC   
Orlando at New Orleans    6:00 PM   
Phoenix at Cleveland    6:00 PM   
Brooklyn at Boston    6:30 PM    ESPN   
Detroit at Dallas    7:30 PM   
Portland at Golden State 9:00 PM   
Denver at Sacramento    9:00 PM   

Sunday, January 19, 2014

NBA: Where Deciding Your Top 10 Happens.

TL;DR: I’m often inspired to write posts based on things my friends say. This week’s post is brought to you by the following question. “Is Houston Rockets shooting guard James Harden in my top 10?”

James Harden is an amazing offensive weapon and a net negative defensive player. He’s the second best free throw producer in the league while also being a horrid 33% 3 point shooter. He’s the best at his position even though the position is quite shallow (Only 2 other players are even vaguely top 20 candidates in Joe Johnson and Dwyane Wade). James Harden for me is a fascinating case for what top ten means.

People often say “X is a top ten player” without really thinking about it. They say top-ten when they actually mean “He’s really good”. People rarely have a actual top 10 list ready. Before I upset some fanbases, I decided I needed to set some parameters for what this top ten list represents. First, when I say top 10 player, I’m talking about the skill set in the present season. This eliminates any of the 2014 draft class (Sorry, Embiid) and has-beens (Hi, Kobe Bryant and the wrath of Lakers Nation). On a related note anyone who is out for the season or projected as such is also eliminated. (My deepest regrets, Derrick Rose, especially because it would simplify the bottom of my top ten list and to a lesser extent, Brook Lopez.)

Second, there’s a problem of describing people with disparate skill sets. How do I compare what Roy Hibbert contributes with what Harden does? Largely, it’s a problem of bias. Even NBA advanced stats don’t do a good job of evaluating individual defensive efforts. I generally prefer centers over shooting guards. However, Harden isn’t your average shooting guard. He’s a competent passer and a huge part of the Rockets offense. For similar reasons, specialists are also out. (Korver is not invited to the party)

Third, despite the value in real life, I’m not including contracts as a part of the decision. (Here there is no difference between Paul Millsap’s team friendly contract and Joe Johnson’s albatross). Ability to create wins also factors in. (Sorry, Kyrie it’s not you it’s me. Even though there’s a chance it could be you. I can’t tell yet. Especially since you don’t have the advance stats this year that Cousins and Love have) 

With that being said we have the official top 10 via tiers. (I’m using tiers because it’s easier that way)  

Tier One - The best of the best – Kevin Durant. Lebron James. Paul George.

Obviously. These are 3 of the most versatile players in the league. They are the best in the game. They show up on both sides of the ball. I’d happily start a real life team around any of them. It’s easy. All of these players are better than Harden. No question. George’s inconsistency puts him at last. Durant is the scoring champion and just put up a 52 point game. That’s why he’s first. It’s total recency bias. Also, he’s been the most fun to watch over the last month or so. 

Tier Two - The often injured but elite point Guards – Chris Paul, Stephen Curry

The point guards worth talking about. They are the team leaders. Elite scorers. I could have easily put Chris Paul or Stephen Curry in the top tier but the injury concerns with both players really bother me.

Tier Three – LaMarcus Aldridge, Anthony Davis, Marc Gasol, Roy Hibbert

I’m an absolute snob for players in the paint. Having defense here matters. In a league where smallball lineups are becoming more common, having a versatile paint protector continues to be a valuable piece. Size is a valuable commodity in the league. Aldridge is the best player on one of the best teams in the league. Hibbert and Davis are the most versatile of the Defensive Player of the Year candidates. Gasol won DPOY last year. If you want to put Harden over any of these players I’d understand. You’d be wrong, but I’d understand. Note: This creates nine spots.

Tier Four - The number 10 spot candidates

Joe Johnson, Dirk Nowitzki, Josh Smith, Blake Griffin, James Harden, Dwight Howard, Kevin Love, Carmelo Anthony, Russell Westbrook, Damien Lillard, DeMarcus Cousins, Tony Parker, Tim Duncan

This isn’t even a tier so much as it’s a list of people who might reasonably be in someone’s top ten (by alphabetical order of team). There are good arguments for any of these players to be in the last spot.  Here is where things get complicated for me. Out of the frontcourt players, I probably choose Kevin Love, despite my Irving-like concerns about the success of his teams. Amongst the backcourt, I probably choose his college teammate Westbrook or the established Tony Parker. Overall, I would normally choose Westbrook to round out my top ten because of all that he provides when healthy, but his knee injury and resulting surgery really concerns me. Kevin Love on the other hand completes the top ten in a way that I really enjoy. He’s a stretch four who can also do great things in the paint. He’s also an elite rebounder. But what Harden provides for a team is pretty much unmatched. Sure, some of his free throws come from being a no-good dirty flopper, but he’s also an exceptional scorer and more versatile than your average shooter. Once he realizes that “guard” is also a part of his job description he could end up much higher. But even if it’s only as a result of injuries to other players, Harden is a top-ten player (for the moment).   

My quest was to create a functional top 10 list. I realize that these lists are controversial by their very nature, and I’m sure people will disagree with the list. That’s fine. This is MY list. If you think that Parker is clearly better than the rest, that’s fine, I invite the discussion. If you look at Cousin’s top-ten PER and can’t keep him out, I get it. If you’re a Suns fan and think that Bledsoe belongs in my top ten, that’s between you and God, but sure, bring it up. If you think that Harden got robbed, sure.  

And as always, thanks for reading.

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Quick Take on “Credibility”

 

TL;DR Credibility is largely based on the difference in knowledge between you and the person you’re talking to. However, the way that you present your knowledge is important too.

People talk about credibility all the time. Whether we’re talking about “Street cred” “Geek Cred” or “Indie Cred”, we’re all discussing the same thing. A certain amount of knowledge of a topic and the ability to be trusted or believed in. The last part is the important part. Being trusted and believed is everything here.

How high the bar is depends on who you’re talking to. I know a decent amount of things about comics. I can readily identify superheroes by sight and can usually identify who’s in DC or Marvel. I’ve watched most of the recent movies. When I talk to someone who can’t tell the difference between Superman and Aquaman, I have lots of credibility. When I went to lunch with someone who writes about comics the way I write about basketball (passionately, often, in-depth), I had virtually none. She discussed the difference between Captain America in different eras and different author’s (illustrator’s?) takes on different heroes and I was lost.

Sometimes the environment that you are in matters. One time, when I was leaving the law school (in scenic Boulder, Colorado), a lady looked at me and then told her companion that “There’s so many thugs here”. (Perhaps it was the baseball cap - hoodie combo or the menacing way I was holding my Torts textbook.) I’ve also heard similar comments about me or about other people. Of course, in my home of Springfield Gardens, there’s zero confusion no matter what I’m wearing. The differences between “thug” and “person in hooded jacket” aren’t exactly nuanced to them.

Faking credibility is problematic. It seems that often the best way to protect ones ego is to pretend to know more than you actually do. You can get away with it (sometimes) if you’re talking to someone who knows less than you. You can’t if they can easily figure out that that you’re making things up. On social media, I’m always surprised by how few questions people ask. The value is in having a strong opinion without supporting that opinion in any way. The discussions are better when people question each other rather than shouting each other down. (I sometimes parody these types of discussions when I see them unfolding as a passive way of pointing out that the discussion is devolving. See every time that I write “TL;DR  X is a Lakers fan, Y is a Heat fan or something along that line.)

I have strong opinions too, but I’m making it a point not to shout down the people who disagree with me. My reasoning behind it is because I think that being a bit tempered helps gives me some credibility. It means that people who disagree with me are more likely to listen, even if after listening they continue to disagree. It also means that I have a better opportunity to talk about incarceration, gun laws and other contentious issues with people who are on the other side. Having discussions that don’t devolve into arguments also makes me better. Talking to the people who believe something I disagree with (Paul George is having a more MVP worthy season than Kevin Durant, for example) helps me to craft better and more useful arguments. It shows me what the weaknesses in my position are and what parts I should at least address.  It means that when I present an opinion I’m going to have more credibility in doing so.

Monday, January 13, 2014

NBA: Where “Bad Spellers Untie” Happens

 


”Huge apologies to my team, to the league an [sic] most of all you the fans! #JRSmithSigningOff “  -JR Smith ‏@TheRealJRSmith 8 Jan

Last year, JR Smith won the 6th man of the year award. He took better shots, made better decisions and turned into a major crowd favorite. During the prior season, Smith played partially in China and returned a changed man. However starting in the playoffs it appeared that the old JR was back. He was suspended  in the playoffs and shot poorly for the rest of 2013.

He then was embroiled in a mini controversy of untying players shoelaces during games. He did this against Houston, against Dallas and he attempted to do it against Detroit. He was fined 50,000 for his actions. The fine was a good thing because I’m always in favor of idiot taxes. It’s one thing to do a dumb thing, but to do it again after the league warned you against is profoundly stupid and he deserves the fine. He also received a DNP-CD (Did Not Play- Coaches Decision) in the following game. In his return, he played and shot exceptionally well.

JR Smith is a fascinating study for knuckleheads in the league. Players like Michael Beasley and DeMarcus Cousins have a ton of talent but are knuckleheads. Putting good leadership around them is helpful. Dennis Rodman, North Korean mediator, former Bulls/Pistons/Spurs/Mavericks player was in this position. When he went to the Bulls, Rodman wasn’t a saint, but his talent/distraction ratio was maximized, partially because his coach and teammates were good leaders. Smith needs a situation like this to succeed.

Nationally Televised Games (All Times EST)

Monday

Washington at Chicago NBATV 8PM

Last week, Chicago traded away their best active player for a future Sacramento pick, a couple of second round picks and the ability to waive Andrew Bynum (and gain the resulting cap space). This means that the Chicago Bulls have officially placed their hat in the ring of the 2014 draft sweepstakes. It's disappointing because, while it's the best decision for the Bulls, the Bulls are universally respected as a team. It's a major disappointment to have them out of the playoff race. However, with Derrick Rose out for yet another season, Mirotic coming as soon as next year, and a pretty big free agency

Washington is a better than mediocre team who has benefited from the East's collapse.

Tuesday

Sacramento at Indiana NBATV 7PM

Tuesdays have the NBA Fan Night Vote. The fans vote for which team they want to watch on Tuesday. The options this week were weak. NYK @ Charlotte, CLE @ LAL and the winner SAC @ IND. I haven't watched the Bobcats much this year and I was looking forward to watching them. I even would have tolerated some Cleveland basketball to see what Irving and Deng look like together. Instead, we're subjected to Indianapolis beating the Kings. Hopefully I'll be wrong but I might have to take the night off.

Wednesday

Utah at San Antonio ESPN 8PM

Utah really disappointed me this year. I expected more out of the Favors/Kanter combo and that's worked out horribly. I figured they'd be bad but fun to watch, but they haven't even been that.

Denver at Golden State ESPN 1030PM

Every time I say "told you so" about Denver, they start winning again. I still maintain that they'll be out of the playoffs, but Denver is frustrating. Meanwhile, Igoudala improves the Warriors so much. Denver misses him.

Thursday

Brooklyn versus Atlanta (London) NBATV 3PM

I've been steadfast about the Hawks being a playoff team. So far this year, it has been easy on this side of the argument. However, the Hawks have struggled with the Horford injury. More importantly, this game is in London which is nice, because unlike American football (sorry, Roger Goodell) basketball is absolutely a global sport. It's a sport that should be played outside of the US occasionally.

New York at Indiana TNT 7PM

New York has looked good since Melo has returned, beating San Antonio, Dallas and Miami.

Oklahoma City at Houston 930PM

My New Year’s resolution was to limit the amount that I say "I told you so" about Houston. That's how much I've been crowing about Houston's lacklusterness. To be fair, Houston isn't exactly a "bad" team. I just didn't think that they will be a title contender which was a controversial take when I said it. One thing that continues to be intriguing about Houston is "What will they do about Asik". Asik has been "injured" for a while, pouting at the end of the bench. It seems that the Rockets want to trade Asik for something. I continue to be intrigued by him, both as a player and as a trade chip. His trade might move the Rockets into the next level.

Friday

LA Clippers at New York 7PM ESPN

The Chris Paul injury is sad, but it hasn't stopped the Clippers from steamrolling their competition.

Golden State at Oklahoma City ESPN 930PM

I like selfish Durant a lot. I always wondered how much scoring he would do if he were wired like Iverson to score at will. Of course, he wouldn't be a better basketball player if he were wired this way, but watching a great scorer do what he does best is always amazing. This is especially true because Westbrook will be back soon, so this only lasts a short period of time.

Saturday

LA Clippers at Indiana NBATV 7PM

Lance Stephenson of the Pacers probably won’t win Most Improved Player, but this year has been his coming out party for those who haven’t been following his story. He went from top high school recruit, to mediocre college player, to 40th pick in the draft, to his current form as a triple double threat and solid teammate.

There are no nationally televised games on Sunday